-
Asked by anon-289994 on 23 Mar 2021.
-
anon answered on 23 Mar 2021:
Hi,
I think this is more of a philosophical problem! We can split ethical philosophy into two main parts: utilitarianism, where the cost and benefits are used to see if the means justify the ends, such as stealing. This can be contrasted with deontology, where the means never justifies the outcome – that is to say, we either commit or don’t commit crime depending on the reasons, or we don’t commit the crime at all no matter the situation for ethical reasons.
Personally, I would go with utilitarianism in most cases of ethics, and in this instance as you ask about stealing, I would say the ends justifies the mean if it meant I could save a life, especially those closest to me. Also considering what and who I am stealing from too – large corporations or small business? Food or money?
Lots of questions to ask from your interesting question!
Comments